Want Space Got Space - Offices, retail and industrial space Want Space Got Space - News about how to find and advertise commercial property to let, rent or sell in England, Wales and Scotland including Offices, Warehouse, Commercial, Manufacturing, Shops and Retail.

 

Categories:

One size fits all, right to light unfair – Lodders

wantspacegotspace.co.uk - One size fits all, right to light unfair – LoddersProposals to simplify costly disputes over right of light in town and city centres should not unfairly impact on homeowners in not so built up areas, real estate lawyers at Lodders Solicitors are warning.

Partner Mark Lee said the proposals published by the Law Commission suggested ending centuries-old “prescriptive rights of light” that give a property owner a right to light once it has been in place for 20 years.
“This has long been a bone of contention with developers who see it purely as a means to enable owners of neighbouring developments to demand large cash settlements, instead of using the planning system to oppose development,” he said.

When the Commission first announced its intention to consider rights of light, one of its objectives was to assess whether the law struck a fair balance between the interests of land owners with the benefit of rights to light and those wishing to develop in the vicinity.

Now that their Consultation has been published, we see that as well as proposing an end to prescriptive rights of light the Commission is calling for a statutory notice procedure requiring potential claimants to confirm if they intend to make a claim; a statutory test to determine whether the courts should award payment of damages or go so far as to prevent the development; and finally that a tribunal could have the power to extinguish rights to light that have become obsolete.

The Law Commission is now inviting comments during a three month consultation period, and Mr Lee said he expected developers to make strong representations.

In introducing the proposals for discussion, the Law Commission said: “We have approached this consultation paper on the basis that rights to light are valuable protections which should be respected.

“But so must the legitimate interests of those involved in developing the land, who are deeply concerned about the uncertainty of the current law and the risk of that uncertainty being exploited by those who benefit from rights to light.”

The eagerly awaited consultation follows a High Court decision in 2010 that left both landowners and developers confused about their position and with little certainty about what to expect from proceedings.  The courts too have found it increasingly tricky and time consuming in reaching decisions in rights to light cases.

“The proposals are aimed at progressing developments through the planning system rather than using an old piece of bureaucracy in a way in which it was never intended,” said Mr Lee.

“The Law Commission will need to be careful it does not impinge on home owners’ rights to light in a ‘domestic’ setting.  
“In suburban and rural settings, it is clearly important that somebody’s proposals for rebuilding or the construction of an extension to their home, do not take away valuable light from the neighbouring property,” he commented.

However, there have been claims in recent years that issues such as rights to light have made inner city regeneration proposals more difficult to formulate, and indeed rendered some projects virtually unviable due to uncertainty as to what claims there might be, the timescale taken and costs involved in resolving disputes.

“What is crucial is that, particularly where there are huge sums of money at stake such as in the City of London or central Birmingham or Coventry, developers need a greater degree of certainty on what the likely challenges might be, and more importantly the time and certainly the cost implications,” said Mr Lee.

As well as comments on specific proposals the Law Commission is also inviting details of examples and evidence of the effects of rights to light claims on funding, delays or alterations to developments and the costs involved.

Posted by The Editor (wantspacegotspace) on 9th September 2013

Back to news list

 Surrey  Leeds  Leicester  Derby  Nottingham  Birmingham  Manchester  London  Essex  Milton Keynes  Northampton 
 Kettering  Cardiff  Basingstoke  Dorset  Shrewsbury  Bristol  Southampton  Reading  Bolton  Coventry  Swansea  High Wycombe 
 Corby  Rugby  Worcester  Chelmsford  Lincoln  Bedford  West Sussex  Doncaster  Wolverhampton  Telford  Croydon  Slough 
 Cornwall  Solihull  Sittingbourne  Fareham  Watford  Portsmouth  Ashford  Greater Manchester  Luton  West Malling  Kings Hill  Middlesex